Candide Modo Fortiter Re

Candide Modo Fortiter Re (Gentle in Manner, Strong in Deed). This is the motto of the Winchester-Thurston School (WT) where I spent many years developing not only intellectually but also interpersonally. Being an all girls’ school, I was sheltered from sexism and sex-discrimination. No one told me I couldn’t or shouldn’t have particular ambitions because of my sex. Although looking back, preconceptions about what women should or should not do did influence some of my career choices.

What WT also sheltered me from is how downright mean men can be in the workplace and because of that, perhaps coupled with my eternal optimism, I never anticipate just how ugly things can get until I am in the middle of them. I get blindsided and ambushed and then behave suboptimally because I was not steeled for a battle I did not foresee. Sometimes I cry. That is not my biology betraying me; it is because I am profoundly disappointed in my fellow humans.

I do not derive any pleasure out of humiliating, intimidating, or harassing other people. I remain incredulous when I am on the receiving end of this kind of behavior from male colleagues. It infuriates me that I have to write about this. I just want to be doing science, not having to bark yet again about sexism in the workplace. I believe the older and more accomplished I get, the worse it has become. Many men simply cannot deal with accomplished women and they have to put them down in order to build themselves up. The very men who should defend us in this situation are bound by some silent bro-code and sit idly back and watch the abuse.

I read all of these “How to deal with sexism in the workplace” articles and many miss the mark. You can’t fix sexism on the job just by having meetings with women and building female coalitions. It helps, and it makes us feel supported, but is just one piece of the solution. We can meet all we want, but we’re still segregated. I recall a revealing story told by a colleague in the UK who was deeply concerned about inequality in the workplace. They organized a monthly meeting called “Women in the Workplace” and invited colleagues of both sexes to attend. No surprise, only women showed up and men presumably used that hour to get more work done. Frustrated, they renamed the meeting, “Sex in the Workplace” and the next month the place was packed with women and men! Then they could make headway.

I firmly believe that displays of egregious behavior at work would decrease if we had more women at the table. Not just one, or two, but an equal number. I have seen this on teleconferences. The more women there are on a call, the more the women speak freely—not just when queried or from pre-scripted presentations, but true creative and scientific discourse.

A close colleague recalled a meeting of muckety-mucks—mostly men. Many of the men knew each other; she did not know most of them. The chair launched straight into the content of meeting. My friend asked whether they could start with introductions, as she did not know everyone in the room. The chair said, “Oh, OK, fine, well then why don’t you start since it’s so important to you.” On how many layers is that demeaning? The bros know each other so let’s dive into it. Overlook the social etiquette of meetings. Demean and trivialize the woman’s request. Send the clear message that “We are going off topic for you.” Are you done now? Anything else the little lady would like before we get down to real business? Nothing worse than a token actually having a voice. Had there been more women in the room, someone could have partnered with her and chimed in saying, “Great idea, it’s important to me too to know who’s at the table, so I’ll start.”

Nick Kristof wrote a good piece in the NYT about old white men not actually realizing when they are being biased. While this might be the case, I think plenty of them are entirely aware and it is a conscious strategy to get to the top. Ninety percent of the people who read this blog will be women. The men who read it will be the ones who already get it. We need to reach the rest of them and hold them accountable for their behavior. If it can’t happen naturally, then it has to be legislated.

I can see how dealing with sexism year after year in academe, the corporate world, or politics can harden women. It would be easier not to care about cooperation, harmony, respect, and humanity. It takes energy to have a conscience.

I fantasize about becoming a battle-axe at times (full ironic use of term intended), but then I see that placard on the wall in WT: Candide Modo Fortiter Re and remember that is not who I want to be. I want to do excellent science, be collegial, and retain my respect for others.

Don’t get me wrong; I am infuriated that I have to spend my time writing this blog. I should be working on a grant right now. Straight old white men don’t have to take time from their work mission to raise awareness and strategize for equality. They line up at the urinals, on the green, or at the bar and make things happen without us there.

How do we get these men to behave better in the workplace? My first thoughts turn to sports. We need more referees like in soccer. We can walk around with yellow and red cards in our purses. If we get manterrupted or mansplained, we hand out a yellow card. If we get manmiliated, we hand out red card and kick them out of the meeting. Men can give us cards too, but for the same offenses, not for requesting introductions. The number of cards you get becomes public record and goes into your job performance and salary considerations.

Although the soccer idea is appealing, real change is necessary. The European Union is taking concrete steps to legislate female presence on corporate boards. According to the NYT, Norway, Spain, France, Iceland, Italy, Belgium, and the Netherlands all have quotas. Germany has recently passed a law requiring that 30% of seats on corporate boards have to be held my women. The 30% club is pushing the issue globally with branches in 10 countries. As reported in the NYT, legislation has been necessary to address inequality, as greater representation of women, “has not happened organically, or through general pressure.” The same should happen in academe, which in many ways remains the most impenetrable bastion of the old boys’ network.

This PEW Report on Women in Leadership is not a new story but it is a current snapshot. No wonder I do not feel as if my interests are represented by my government, by corporate America, or in my workplace.

We have a problem and it will not change on its own. One very real consequence of speaking out against inequality is being labeled as militant, a malcontent, or another word used to describe women with strong opinions. Labeling is just another strategy for silencing. You can call me anything you want; the numbers speak for themselves.

To help with this, we need more men of conscience to work with us. The bro-code of silence needs to be broken and more men need to request and even demand the presence of women in leadership positions. Gentlemen, it is not emasculating to advocate for equality, in fact, quite the opposite is true.

My motto for the day is, “One is not enough.” Men in leadership positions cannot assuage their conscience by making room for a lone woman at the table. Having us there in numbers will improve your ability to make decisions that represent your stakeholders, make the team smarter and more creative, and keep your behavior in check. Yellow card!

One thought on “Candide Modo Fortiter Re

  1. The people who “are” and “have” and “decide” worry that anything but the status quo will be bad for them, a doomsday somehow. Even if they aren’t sure what that might mean; what it would look like; what would be “bad” about it.

    And it really is too bad when we can’t find our way to a balanced, more fair, more representative (and better) place on our own … “organically.” When it’s legislated or mandated or otherwise done less cooperatively and willingly, the stutter-steps of the rough road there also often brings the unfortunate red-herrings of “the-very-‘bad’-they-feared” before the better becomes apparent, internalized, normalized.

    But when you look at movements and change, about equality and treating people well; sharing opportunity, growth, accomplishment and set-backs … the journey toward solutions seems to benefit everyone in the long run. If I think about the fight for civil rights, including the Civil Rights Act and the Brown v The Topeka Board of Education (and the education and other cases that grew from it), I see an American society that really has more to offer all of its members of all races than it did or would have without the communication, ideas, remedies and advances those issues prompted.

    Our kids wouldn’t have had nearly the opportunities, rigor, equipement, instruction or socio-cultural exposure, education, interaction and relationships to build upon that they do and have had. Our schools likely wouldn’t have worked to offer compelling magnet and other specialty programs that have grown to become part of a much more vigorous, sophisticated, well-rounded curriculum that can include advanced and IB programs, language-centric and immersion, technical and vocational innovation and variety, engineering, STEM and STEAM, “middle college” and all the equipment, labs, materials, experiences and more that come with those programs. Those programs don’t just cater to meeting quotas … they offer all students multiple opportunities to find a niche in the system; multiple ways to define and experience success; the opportunity to discover skills that might never have emerged (which also may help those students and teachers realize new and varied ways to learn core concepts).

    Those educations come back to the community with members who value, model and expect a broad range of skills, competence, excellence, involvement and innovation and have the ability, expectation and power to join the discussions with all those backgrounds and competencies to further inform, strategize and build the ongoing generations of “better.” They grow partnerships with employers; naturally encourage wider socio-cultural circles and social/cultural understanding, engagement and contributions to family, society, science, business, government, the endless bounds of the free-marketplace, competition and motivation, even the unanticipated and undesireable “stuff” that inevitably weaves itself into change.

    Everyone is called to step-up; to be their best selves and better … eventually, if only to compete. As a result, everyone is better for it … the struggle; the journey; the intended and unintended consequences. We are more nimble; more agile; a sharper, stronger people, community, society, world.

    People didn’t know what they could or would or might be missing by standing firm in racism, stereotypes; inequalities; nonsense theories and false beliefs; clinging to exclusion … they didn’t know what they didn’t know, until all they know is challenged and tested. And all of that knowing and doing either stands strong to the challenge or the failures lead to the important evidence of what doesn’t work and, finally, what does … until environments, circumstances, evidence calls for another evolution. Fear. That’s the biggest obstacle.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>